Comments on: pylons http://dryice.name/blog/python/turbogears/pylons/ Sat, 19 May 2012 15:49:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3 By: Yuce http://dryice.name/blog/python/turbogears/pylons/#comment-2 Yuce Thu, 10 May 2007 01:51:10 +0000 http://dryice.name/blog/python/turbogears/pylons/#comment-2 Hey! Here are some random comments on this: - Pylons have inherent AJAX support, see: http://docs.pythonweb.org/display/pylonscookbook/Getting+started+with+AJAX - I agree that routes (pylons' url matcher) is ugly, but not as ugly as django's (pure regexps!) though! - I guess pylons can return json natively (but i don't have the pointers for that) but it doesn't really matter when we have tools like simplejson. - I agree 100% that it sucks not being able to handle i18n the templates (pylons), but I think/hope this may change with mako replacing myghty. - Lastly, I didn't write a single piece of TG code (shame!), but I think pylons looks like more of a framework, where TG looks like a collection of APIs. Best wishes. Hey!

Here are some random comments on this:

- Pylons have inherent AJAX support, see:
http://docs.pythonweb.org/display/pylonscookbook/Getting+started+with+AJAX

- I agree that routes (pylons’ url matcher) is ugly, but not as ugly as django’s (pure regexps!) though!

- I guess pylons can return json natively (but i don’t have the pointers for that) but it doesn’t really matter when we have tools like simplejson.

- I agree 100% that it sucks not being able to handle i18n the templates (pylons), but I think/hope this may change with mako replacing myghty.

- Lastly, I didn’t write a single piece of TG code (shame!), but I think pylons looks like more of a framework, where TG looks like a collection of APIs.

Best wishes.

]]>